The wrong public policy doesn't just fail.
It costs votes, credibility, and time

Public consultations tell you what stakeholders said in the room. They don't tell you what people will actually accept when the policy lands. That gap is where ministers get surprised.
Mockup image
Device frame

Consultations produce noise. Policy requires decisions.

Knowing what stakeholders say today is not the same as knowing what they will accept tomorrow.

Everyone's priority is first
Feature icon

Traditional consultation captures what stakeholders say they want right now. It cannot tell you what shifts when funding is capped, how one group responds when another gets priority, or where the real tolerance limits are before the announcement is made.

No one forced the tradeoff
Feature icon

Traditional consultation captures what stakeholders say they want right now. It cannot tell you what shifts when funding is capped, how one group responds when another gets priority, or where the real tolerance limits are before the announcement is made.

The surprise comes after
Feature icon

Funding decisions, implementation timelines, and legislative commitments all get made on consultation data that cannot answer the question that actually matters: if this policy lands as written, what should we expect from the people it affects?

Saying it and meaning it are different
Feature icon

People say they support a policy until it affects them directly. What someone says in a consultation room and what they do when the policy lands are two very different things. The gap between the two is where ministers get surprised.

Find out what people will actually accept -- before the announcement

Model the tradeoffs before making them. Know where the tipping points are before committing a dollar or a press release.

Nobel Prize-winning decision science models how stakeholders actually weigh competing priorities -- not what they say in a consultation room, but what they will accept when the real tradeoffs are on the table.

The output is prescriptive. Implement this element and here is how acceptance moves. Phase it this way and here is how the opposition responds. Which provisions are essential. Which ones are flexible. Where there is room to adjust and where there isn't.

This is not a consultation report. It is a policy decision engine
Mockup image
Device frame

Nobel Prize-winning science. Better policy. Fewer surprises.

The credentials behind the work -- not academic theory, applied decision science with a track record across government ministries and public sector organizations across Canada.

  • PROVEN SCIENCE

    • Nobel Prize-winning decision science
    • Forces real stakeholder tradeoffs, not wish lists
    • Predictive, not just descriptive

  • DEEP EXPERIENCE

    • 25+ years applying to Canadian public policy
    • Federal and provincial government clients
    • Thought leader and published author

  • REAL RESULTS

    • Applied across health, forestry, oil sands, and children's services
    • Identified tipping points before announcements were made
    • Prescriptive policy briefs, not consultation reports

No time for full fieldwork before the announcement? There is still an answer.

Syntellia uses AI to generate insights from Canadian stakeholder profiles in days -- a faster, leaner alternative when the policy timeline does not allow for a full study.

Fresh thinking on hard decisions

No fluff.

Just useful thinking on the decisions that matter.

  • Contact us

Submission Successful

The form has been successfully submitted.